Bridgestone UltraWeather vs Falken Aklimate tires

Bridgestone UltraWeather tires

The Bridgestone UltraWeather is built and designed for use on sedans, CUVs, SUVs, and minivans and offers excellent grip and performance in unpredictable weather throughout the year. The tire maintains flexibility in freezing temperatures and also resists wear in warm weather conditions. It has features like 3D full-depth sipes to increase surface-biting ability on paved roads and packed snow, and it can also resist hydroplaning to provide consistent wet grip. Additionally, it is Three Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) certified for use in moderate to severe winter conditions.

Overall, the UltraWeather is rated an exceptional 9.0 SimpleScore, thanks to its excellent traction, outstanding controllability, and great service life.

Get Bridgestone UltraWeather tires at the best deals for your vehicle here

Falken Aklimate tires

The Falken Aklimate is designed and engineered to offer drivers a single, reliable option to drive with confidence across changing seasons. This advanced all-weather tire features an optimized rubber compound that provides consistent grip on the road and has features like Falken’s 3D canyon sipe technology and strategically placed snow claws to improve biting ability in hard-packed snow and icy pavement. Like its peer, the Aklimate is also Three Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) certified to offer confident driving in moderate to severe winter weather and has features like wide circumferential channels and lateral grooves to force water away and provide hydroplaning resistance. Additionally, its pattern design also keeps the noise levels in control.

Overall, the Aklimate achieves a great 8.9 SimpleScore because of its excellent tread life, reliable handling, and solid traction performance.

Get Falken Aklimate tires at the best deals for your vehicle here

Bridgestone UltraWeather vs Falken Aklimate tires on traction

Let's now examine the traction performance of both tires to find out how each tire performs when it comes to mechanical grip in dry, wet, and wintry conditions.

Starting with the UltraWeather, the tire achieves an excellent 9.2 SimpleScore rating in traction. All credit to its cold-weather-suitable rubber compound, deep and wide circumferential grooves, and dense siping that offer solid grip and resist hydroplaning in conditions like rain, light winter weather, and packed snow. The flexible rubber compound adapts better to wintry conditions for all-weather performance, backed by Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certification. Additionally, its block edges are sharp enough to boost dry weather grip and traction.

On the other hand, the Aklimate receives a solid 8.6 SimpleScore in traction. This tire features 3D canyon sipes, snow claws, and 3PMSF-approved construction and compounding to offer solid biting ability in severe winter conditions. The optimized construction and design improve traction performance on slushy or rainy highways, and the circumferential grooves facilitate seamless water channeling from the contact patch to resist hydroplaning.

In traction, the UltraWeather surpasses the Aklimate to claim the victory and assures superior all-weather grip and traction.

ADVANTAGE: Bridgestone UltraWeather

Bridgestone UltraWeather vs Falken Aklimate tires on handling

Next, we find out which of the two tires is better in handling and has better steering response, cornering, stability, and braking efficiency.

Beginning with the UltraWeather, the tire achieves an outstanding 9.1 SimpleScore in handling. The sturdy center ribs and interlocking intermediate blocks provide the much-needed stability under lateral forces, crisp steering response, and excellent high-speed tracking. Likewise, the flat footprint and ribs contribute to outstanding steering response.

Contrarily, the Aklimate achieves a great 8.7 SimpleScore in handling. Its 3D canyon sipes interlock while driving with higher load capacities to avoid tread block squirm, assuring confident lane changes, improved highway stability, and confident turning ability. The footprint’s flat contact patch further stabilizes the ride, and the sipes ensure improved braking performance in wet and slick conditions.

Here again, in the handling round, it is the UltraWeather that excels by a slightly higher margin, leading 2-0!

ADVANTAGE: Bridgestone UltraWeather

Bridgestone UltraWeather vs Falken Aklimate tires on longevity

Longevity is an important factor when buying tires, so let’s find out which all-weather tire is better at resisting wear across multiple seasons.

The UltraWeather is rated an impressive 8.9 SimpleScore for its long-lasting service. This tire is also covered by a 60,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty. The strong and durable rubber compound of the UltraWeather and the optimized footprint distribution prevent uneven wear for extended service life. The inner strength lines, robust casing, and optimized compound further shield the tire from driving pressures to offer a longer tread life.

On the other hand, the Aklimate surprises with an exceptional 9.5 SimpleScore in longevity, assuring impressive wear resistance. This tire is backed by a 65,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty. The wear-resistant rubber compound along with uniform contact patch controls rubber degradation for a lasting utility. The inner construction of the tire is also engineered for increased rigidity, keeping the tire in its original shape and preventing uneven wear.

In longevity, it is the Aklimate that flips the game and claims the victory, concluding the comparative analysis with a 2-1.

ADVANTAGE: Falken Aklimate

When to use each

Both the UltraWeather and the Aklimate are all-weather tires and come with a Three Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) to help you gain grip and traction in moderate to severe winter weather, as well as in dry, wet, and light winter conditions. These tires provide better grip throughout the year than all-season tires. However, they are not suitable for driving in off-road conditions and should only be considered for driving on pavement.

Based on rim sizes, the UltraWeather is available in 17- to 22-inch rim options, while the Aklimate is available in 15- to 22-inch rim options.

Which one should you choose?

Based on overall SimpleScores, the UltraWeather is a better tire than the Aklimate (9.0 vs 8.9). However, your decision to buy tires should be based on your driving style, budget, and needs. As far as the prices are concerned, the UltraWeather is available at a starting price of at least $178 per tire, which means a set of four is available from $712 onwards. On the other hand, the Aklimate is offered at a starting price of at least $107 per tire, which means a set of four is available at a starting price of $428.

Looking at SimpleScore, you must choose the Bridgestone UltraWeather if you:

• Drive a vehicle like the Honda Civic, Nissan Altima, or Subaru Outback.
• Want a tire that’s better in handling (9.1 vs 8.7).
• Want a tire that’s better in traction (9.2 vs 8.6).
• Want a tire that offers better braking performance in wet conditions and crisp on-center steering response.
• Want a tire that’s available in 17- to 22-inch rim sizes.
• Are comfortable paying more for a better-known brand.

On the other hand, you should consider the Falken Aklimate if you:

• Drive a vehicle like the Toyota Camry, Hyundai Elantra, or Subaru Forester.
• Need a long-lasting tire (9.5 vs 8.9).
• Need a tire that’s backed by a 65,000 mile limited manufacturer tread life warranty.
• Need a tire that features dedicated snow claws and 3D canyon siping for confident grip in winter snow conditions.
• Need a tire that’s more affordable and comes in 15- to 22-inch rim options.

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help, as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.